Using the straw for biorefining contributes to the sustainability of cereal cropping. Credit: Janne Hansen What is the best cereal cropping system when considering the impacts on global warming, eutrophication, land use in a global perspective, and arable land quality? In collaboration with Aarhus University and the University of Copenhagen, Novozymes used life cycle analyses to unravel some of the facts. The results have been published in the report ”Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Danish Cereal Cropping Systems” by DCA – Danish Centre for Food and Agriculture, Aarhus University.
The scientists analysed six cereal cropping systems that included spring barley or winter wheat, various sowing times, the use of catch crops or intercrops, and ways of dealing with the straw. They found that early sown winter wheat, where the straw is removed every second year and used in biorefining, is the best of six different cereal cropping systems with regard to total environmental impact.
In the analysis, the scientists took many factors into account, including grain yield, straw yield, soil carbon storage, greenhouse gas emissions, arable land use, and loss of nutrients to the environment. A central element in the analyses was the use of the cereal straw, i.e., to what extent the straw was incorporated into the soil or used in a biorefinery for co-production of bioethanol, biogas, and bioelectricity.
The system of early sowing of winter wheat and export of straw every second year came out best with regard to both greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient losses to the environment.
This is partly because early sown winter wheat has better grain and straw yields compared to spring barley and winter wheat sowed at the normal time. Reduced yields result in increased crop production elsewhere, which takes up more arable land. Another positive aspect of this cropping system is that the straw is used to replace gasoline, natural gas, and electricity.
The analyses demonstrate the importance of taking a bird’s eye view when evaluating the total environmental consequences of cereal production. The scientists behind the study recommend that crop production be viewed in a full life cycle perspective. The differences in yield between the cropping systems can have great impact on their individual environmental profiles and the use of straw in biorefinery can improve the environmental profile significantly.
”The collaboration with agricultural scientists from Aarhus University and the University of Copenhagen has been very fruitful and has lifted the scientific level of the analysis substantially,” says sustainability specialist at Novozymes Jesper Hedal Kløverpris, who conducted the life cycle analyses.
Professor Bent T. Christensen from the Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, agrees:
”This collaboration has led to results that have given us a new and more nuanced angle on the sustainability of cereal production,” he says.
Explore further:Cropping research takes advantage of divergent growth patterns
More information: Environmental life cycle assessment of Danish cereal cropping systems: web.agrsci.dk/djfpublikation/index.asp?action=show&id=1220
Provided by:Aarhus University