Blanca Ochoa. Credit: University of the Basque Country The study of Palaeolithic art is \”one of the few tools we have to find out about the culture and society of prehistoric groups,\” says Blanca Ochoa, researcher in the UPV/EHU\’s department of Geography, Prehistory and Archaeology. Knowing who the representations were meant for \”could indicate the intended use of cave art for prehistoric groups—whether it was something for the whole group, shared by all its members, or whether it was limited to small groups, or even to just one individual,\” she explains. In her research, the aim was to specify whether there were any preferences in terms of choosing the spaces where the Palaeolithic representations were drawn or engraved. The study encompassed nine caves on the Cantabrian coast located in Asturias and Cantabria. \”It is an aspect that has been analysed very little until now,\” says the researcher. Her team developed an in-house methodology to analyse the visibility of the figures depicted, which covers not only variables relating to the space where they are located (room size, accessibility, presence of natural light, etc.) but also characteristics relating to the depictions themselves.
\”The size of the works, the height they are at, and, above all, the technique used to execute them (painting or engraving) largely determines visibility,\” says Ochoa. \”The paintings are much more visible than the engravings, and even more so if the engraving is not very deep.\”
Differences in location, possible change of use
As Ochoa explains, among the most interesting results they extracted in the research were observed chronological differences. \”Throughout the Upper Palaeolithic, the topographical distribution of the works gradually changed. During the early phases of the Upper Palaeolithic, there is a preference for executing medium-sized and large drawings in the main galleries of the caves. During the Magdalenian, between 20,000 and 12,000 years ago, there was an increase in the use of spaces located in places far from the main cave route, in small, sometimes concealed rooms; additionally, there was a preference for a smaller size when it came to creating the figures and an increase in the use of the engraving as a technique. Art may have been intended to be seen by the community during the Pre-Magdalenian. The use of smaller spaces during the Magdalenian, however, could indicate that art became something more restricted, or that it performed another kind of function.\” Panel located in the cave at La Pasiego (Puente Viesgo, Cantabria). Credit: University of the Basque Country As it is a new type of study and conducted in a limited geographical area, Ochoa stresses the preliminary nature of the results obtained. Nevertheless, she believes it will \”help to establish the bases to find out who Palaeolithic art was intended for. We have confirmed that the methodology developed does, in fact, work, and that it can be applied in other areas of the Cantabrian region or outside it. I would like to continue with the research, because the results for this area have been very interesting, and I would like to see whether the conclusions we have drawn can be extended to other areas. Although there will probably be geographical differences as well, and the different groups may have had other uses of art.\”
Explore further:Palaeolithic humans from the north of Spain moved homes to dwellings with better logistics
More information: Marcos García-Diez et al, Temps et réseaux de l\’art paléolithique : la grotte de La Covaciella (Asturies, Espagne), L\’Anthropologie (2016). DOI: 10.1016/j.anthro.2015.11.001
Provided by:University of the Basque Country
feedback to editors